Posts Tagged debate
Alberta 2012 Leadership Debate
Posted by gordonmcdowell in Alberta, Calgary, Politics on 2012-04-17
On 2012-04-12 (April 12th, 2012) the leaders of Alberta’s political parties faced off for a debate. All except Glenn Taylor for Alberta Party. I’d spoken to Glenn previously, and would have very much liked to have seen him participate in the debate.
So I hope you enjoy the “Alberta 2012 All Candidate Leadership Debate“.
Alberta Party let me video their War Room. Glenn was responding to debate questions in real time via a team of people monitoring various online communication channels. After the debate, Glenn restated the full answers on video.
I edited that after-the-debate video footage appropriately into the broadcast debate timeline. Also included (in real chronological order) are the creation of responses Alberta Party posted online during commercial breaks.
There was a lot more War Room action during the debate, but I didn’t want to cut away from any of the other 4 candidates, or interrupt the flow of the debate. So I stuck to commercial breaks.
I do hope anyone who hasn’t yet watched the debate does so with this version. It contains all the debate footage. No opening or closing statements are missing. And it includes Alberta Party responses. Yet is is shorter than the broadcast version.
Alberta Party Leadership Forum 2011 Calgary
Posted by gordonmcdowell in Alberta, Environment, Politics, thorium on 2011-05-17
Alberta Party’s leadership convention in Calgary featured 4 obviously competent candidates. Chelsea Pratchett was already streaming this event for OpenFile Calgary.
However, I had a specific question to ask. I was there taping anyway, so here’s my coverage!
My question, which was not presented (probably due to its length):
Alberta wastes valuable natural gas in process of adding hydrogen to bitumen, resulting in oil that can be then processed into gasoline etc.
Deploying LFTRs (Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors) would supply us with heat and electricity which would (using copper-chlorine cycle) let us stop wasting our natural gas in this process.
China is racing ahead of everyone in LFTR development, and have stated their intention to control the intellectual property.
LFTR promises inexpensive electricity, reduce our CO2 output when processing oil sands, and offers vast improvements over every other commercial form of fission, including our widely respected CANDU.
LFTR enables local inexpensive energy production. Can we invest in LFTR research instead of soon-to-be-redundant transmission line capacity? Or will we be paying licensing fees to China when we inevitably build these things?
Not having this question answered during the forum, here are the candidates discussing thorium afterwards…
Lee Easton on Thorium
Randy Royer on Thorium
Glenn Taylor on Thorium
Glenn Taylor left before I had a chance to approach him at the forum (he happened to be the last person I could have gotten to). Glenn has since spoken with me via recorded video Skype about Thorium.
Tammy Maloney on Thorium
I briefly spoke to Tammy after the debate, and she suggested we discuss the topic by phone before she go on the record discussing the subject. She’d seen TEDxYYC Kirk Sorensen video “Can Thorium End Our Energy Crisis?” already, but wasn’t ready yet to speak on the topic.
We have since had a decent phone conversation, and Tammy is aware of the many Albertan industries which can benefit from our use of LFTR. She agrees it is important, but does not see where funds for research can be found, asking where does one cut to find the money.
Tammy won’t be able to participate in a recorded Skype call before the leadership election.
Alberta Party – Good for LFTR?
My sense at this point, from the candidates I’ve spoken to, is that they’re open to new technology, and appreciate that this is indeed a different type of nuclear power.
They all deserve credit for having some knowledge of the subject before our conversations: I’d tweeted them in advance I’d like to discus LFTR, so our discussion was less “what is LFTR?” and more about their approach to new technologies.
The most promising aspect of the Alberta Party in this matter: their policy can be influenced by a grassroots movement to promote this clean energy technology. Certainly I don’t have answers for how research can be funded. But if enough Alberta Party members from industries demanding cheap electricity (or enough Alberta Party environmentalists understand what is being offered), it is quite feasible LFTR will soon have political allies at the provincial level.
What is LFTR?
And just in case you were only looking for debate coverage of Alberta Party leadership candidates, and you have no clue what this “LFTR” thing is of which I speak… Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor.
It is the most practical & essential technology I’ve ever heard of, since some guy decided mice needed lasers instead of balls.
10 Minute TEDx video – “Can Thorium End Our Energy Crisis?”
16 Minute (more technical) video – “LFTR in 16 Minutes”
If you’ve watched those 2 videos, then the most important piece of information you need to know is this: China is already researching thorium powered molten salt reactors, and they’re seeking to file patents on the technology.
2011-10-21 Update:
THORIUM REMIX 2011 is now complete. This is my recommended video resource for learning about the Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor (a type of Thorium Molten Salt Reactor). It begins with a brief summary comparing LFTR to Pressurized Water Reactors (PWR).
2011 Calgary-Centre-North all candidate forum at Wild Rose United Church
Posted by gordonmcdowell in Calgary, Politics on 2011-04-28
A potted plant no more, Conservative Michelle Rempel joined (Green) Heather Macintosh, (Marxist-Leninist), Peggy Askin, (Liberal) Stephen Randall & (NDP) Paul Vargis for a very lively debate.
I don’t live in Calgary-Centre-North, but @harpsinyyc and @Oryxzen suggested this was an important event. Based on the audience intensity, it seemed pretty important.
Green Heather MacIntosh |
Liberal Stephen Randall |
NDP Paul Vargis |
Conservative Michelle Rempel |
Marxist-Leninist Peggy Askin |
|
This video is released under Creative Commons share-alike 3.0 license. If you remix it, link to my original. If you post a remix to YouTube, be sure to also use an annotation hyperlink.
I don’t want anyone complaining that the applause levels don’t reflect reality. I’m having trouble with my video editing software SONY VEGAS, which crashes when I perform a copy/paste operation, so I’m stuck with a single audio track for this video. The single audio track is board audio, so the candidates certainly sound good. But the sound person wasn’t worried about accurately passing the crowd’s cheering and booing to the speakers, since everyone in the room could hear that quite clearly anyway.
Hey, you ask, SONY… Isn’t that the same company that just lost all their Playstation customer info to a hacker? And sent out CDs infected with Trojans back in 2005? They kill puppies don’t they?
I can’t speak to the puppy question, all I know is their video editing software as-of version 10.0c won’t let me copy/paste reliably. Copy/paste! (Final Cut X is coming out in July for $300. Good to hear.)
Anyway…
15 Minute Highlight Reel
If you don’t have 92 minutes to spend watching the entire debate, there’s a Calgary-Centre-North Forum 15 minute highlight reel you should check out. It may not cover everything, but what it does cover is pretty interesting.
VoteCalgary (housing construction) Mayoral Forum
Posted by gordonmcdowell in Calgary, Politics on 2010-10-10
VoteCalgary (funded by Calgary’s housing construction industry) presented our mayoral candidates with questions which allowed candidates to pitch “consumer choice” and “freedom” against sustainable growth, should they so choose.
Comparing candidates performance at VoteCalgary forum, then contrasting against their performance against CivicCamp forum (where “sustainable” is all the rage) could have reflected poorly on any candidate to played too strongly to their respective audience. But candidates pretty much held their ground no matter who they were speaking to. (Darn! No explosive juxtapositions between debates!)
This forum (which allowed rebuttals and rebuttal-rebuttals) was refreshingly short… aside from an introductory question, and a closing question, the only non-bookend question was “How will you support inward, upward and outward city growth?”
Host |
Craig |
Joe |
Bob |
Barb |
Jon |
Ric |
Naheed |
Wayne |
|
introduction | 00:40 | 02:28 | 04:04 | 05:20 | 06:54 | 08:28 | 10:04 | 11:37 | |
city growth | 15:58 | 14:53 | 13:48 | ||||||
17:28 | 16:30 | ||||||||
21:31 | 20:27 | 19:24 | 18:52 | 18:30 | |||||
23:38 | 22:44 | 21:46 | 24:45 | ||||||
26:17 | 25:20 | ||||||||
28:00 | 27:21 | ||||||||
differentiate | 29:02 | 29:56 | 31:00 | 32:04 | 33:12 | 34:15 | 35:18 | 36:21 |
This video is released under Creative Commons share-alike 3.0 license.
CivicCamp Mayoral Forum
Posted by gordonmcdowell in Calgary, Politics on 2010-10-06
Our mayoral candidates faced off in University of Calgary’s MacEwan Hall for what must have been a grueling 2 hour plus debate. CivicCamp‘s inclusion of Oscar Fech and Gary Johnston brought the total participants up to 10 (out of the 15 running), in what is currently looking to be a 3-way race.
“What’s going on here? Can you believe it!?” -Oscar Fech
Did you know many candidates are polling at zero? As an infamous FOX NEWS host would say, “Now is no time to give up!”
The CivicCamp forum followed ArtsVote’s limited responses token system (this time it was poker chips), which kept things at a brisk pace, as did the entertaining lightning round.
This video is released under Creative Commons share-alike 3.0 license.
And I’d like to apologize to any color blind folk looking at my table. I’ve run out of ideas how to visually compress this information.
ArtsVote Calgary – Mayoral Forum
Posted by gordonmcdowell in Calgary, Politics on 2010-09-30
An optimal candidate debate probably has some similarity to an optimal team size, too many members result in confusion, and ultimately… despair.
“The organizers had to make arrangements to get the candidates quite early. There are a few candidates running for mayor who are not onstage, but are here this afternoon. Afterwards, stick around and you can put your questions to them.” – Jim Brown
It would appear ArtsVote, by soliciting participation early and having a deadline, has solved this problem. Good on them, because the result was a better forum.
And, seriously, they put thought into how to force candidates to use their time wisely, and only speak when they have a critical point to make.
I enjoyed this Calgary mayoral forum immensely, and I hope you do too. Thanks to Chelsea Pratchett for help covering the event, and to ArtsVote for allowing me to do this in an official capacity.
Host |
Wayne |
Ric |
Naheed |
Jon |
Joe |
Craig |
Bob |
Barb |
introduction | 01:33 | 03:29 | 05:04 | 06:44 | 08:25 | 10:00 | 11:37 | 13:17 |
forced closures | 19:22 | 21:02 | 17:18 | |||||
affordable space | 24:29 | 22:26 | ||||||
accessibility | 29:00 | 30:56 | 32:29 | |||||
CATA budget | 34:10 | 35:49 | 36:55 | |||||
arts festivals | 43:10 | 39:08 | 41:27 | |||||
funding solution | 50:14 | 46:39 | 48:35 | |||||
retain artists | 54:20 | 55:48 | 52:32 | |||||
funding pitch | 60:15 | 61:57 | 58:13 | |||||
buh bye | 67:00 | 66:38 | 66:13 | 65:24 | Gone! | 64:43 | 64:15 | 63:35 |
This video is released under Creative Commons share-alike 3.0 license.
Calgary Leadership Forum’s Mayoral Debate
Posted by gordonmcdowell in Calgary, Politics on 2010-09-17
Derek McKenzie joined the mayoral race! Anyone else? Anyone? Anyone? C’mon folks, there’s still a month to go. What else are you going to do with your time?
The embedded video was shot & edited by Chelsea Pratchett (with help from Clinton Waller) on behalf of CalgaryDemocracy.ca. My contribution is strictly hosting it on my long-video-enabled YouTube account, and constructing the index table below.
If you don’t like my snarky comments below, don’t blame CalgaryDemocracy.ca, they’re 100% neutral and snark free!
Host |
Kent |
Wayne |
Ric |
Paul |
Naheed |
Jon |
Joe |
Derek |
Craig |
Bob |
Alnoor |
introduction | 0:10:53 | 0:15:16 | 0:20:04 | 0:34:51 | 0:40:18 | 0:29:43 | 0:00:17 | 0:45:26 | 0:05:39 | 0:49:08 | 0:24:51 |
Alnoor, if you were still in the race, how would you cut taxes 2.5% annually? | 0:54:10 | ||||||||||
Bob, is Calgary LRT really all that? | 0:55:34 | ||||||||||
Bob, how to deal with the deficit? | 0:57:09 | ||||||||||
Craig, how do you really feel about park & ride? | 0:59:40 | ||||||||||
Craig, are you for, and what priority is, the airport tunnel? | 1:01:21 | ||||||||||
Derek! Have you by chance been involved in community work? | 1:03:08 | ||||||||||
Derek!?! Is council an equal partner in managing community’s business? | 1:04:05 | ||||||||||
Joe, how do we attract staff for the new hospital? | 1:05:01 | ||||||||||
I’ve just spoken to our psyentistz. Joe, the fluoride is toxic. | 1:06:04 | Our precious bodily fluids! | |||||||||
Jon, why did we let the province take our taxes? | 1:08:12 | You can get them back, right? | |||||||||
Jon, how can we provide affordable housing? | 1:09:30 | (To low income community?) | |||||||||
Naheed, what budget process will you use? | 1:11:19 | (To make the administration accountable?) | |||||||||
Naheed, how to fund the airport tunnel? | 1:13:00 | Let’s be like Charles Bronson in The Great Escape! | |||||||||
Paul, why is housing unaffordable? | 1:14:41 | It contributes to our homeless problem. | |||||||||
Paul, how can Calgary’s arts & culture | 1:16:08 | become world class? <take-a-shot /> | |||||||||
Ric, transportation. | 1:18:18 | You can fix that, right? | |||||||||
Ric, how would you | 1:20:51 | balance new projects against our debt level? | |||||||||
Wayne, how would you | 1:22:29 | bring cohesion to council process? | |||||||||
Wayne, how would you | 1:23:17 | support the homeless… with buns? | |||||||||
Kent, can you | 1:24:45 | make Calgary safer? | |||||||||
Kent, | 1:26:14 | you like gay people, right? | |||||||||
closing | 1:29:56 | 1:29:54 | 1:31:50 | 1:33:28 | 1:35:38 | 1:37:53 | 1:39:27 | 1:41:22 | 1:43:00 | 1:45:08 | 1:47:35 |
You might notice a few small errors in the video’s title cards. Our workflow was a bit messy, as I’d never used iMovie before, let alone someone else’s project.